Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Rafael Nadal vs Holger Rune Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nadal vs Rune analysis and find out who is favored!
Rafael Nadal vs Holger Rune Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Nadal 0 - 0 Rune
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nadal has won 53.74% of points on his second serve, while Rune has won 54.68%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nadal, in recent form, has won 53.29% of his opponent's second serve points, while Rune has won 49.11%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.58% and 27.61% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nadal has saved 55.1% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Rune has saved 68.51% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nadal has won 63.64% of matches played (W/L 7/ 4), with Rune winning 57.14% (W/L 36/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nadal has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 90% (W/L 506/ 56), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 68% (W/L 82/ 38). Rune has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 73% (W/L 60/ 22), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 40/ 35).
- Player level: In the last year, Nadal has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 4/ 2), where as Rune has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 67.86% of matches (W/L 19/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nadal has played against opponents with an average rank of 104.36 while Rune has played against players with an average rank of 142.63.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nadal has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Rune has won 55% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nadal has converted 43.75% of breakpoint opportunities, and Rune has converted 34.27% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
276
Rank
1
High
37
Age
L
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
13
Rank
4
High
21
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
82% (1119-240)
Career Total W/L
66% (224-116)
64% (7-4)
YTD W/L
66% (19-10)
$96,533,810
Career Prize Money
$5,763,560
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Rafael Nadal | Holger Rune |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 64% (7/4) | 66% (19/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 60% (15/10) | 60% (44/29) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (131/104) | 52% (375/352) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (2/1) | 67% (10/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 63% (5/3) | 67% (6/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.19 | 0.54 |
| Aces Total | 22 | 192 |
| DFs per game | 0.17 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 19 | 69 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:1:36 | 2:1:6 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 104.36 | 177.79 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (490/717) | 61% (1423/2332) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (342/490) | 73% (1044/1423) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 54% (122/227) | 55% (497/909) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (35/80) | 34% (61/178) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (298/745) | 36% (810/2279) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 67% (4/2) | 60% (6/4) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 60% (3/2) | 71% (12/5) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (7/11) | 67% (18/27) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 88% (14/16) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (2/3) | 64% (7/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (7/6) | 94% (17/16) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (7/1) | 6% (17/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (4/1) | 25% (12/3) |
Rafael Nadal Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Hubert Hurkacz
Player
Rafael Nadal
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rafael Nadal
Player
Zizou Bergs
62%
(
58 of
93)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
78)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
34%
(
32 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
27 of
78)
88
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Jiri Lehecka
Player
Rafael Nadal
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
89%
(
41 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
17 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Rafael Nadal
Player
Pedro Cachin
78%
(
59 of
76)
1st Serve %
61%
(
74 of
122)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
48)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
65 of
122)
109
Total Points Won
89
|
6-1 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rafael Nadal
Player
Alex De Minaur
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rafael Nadal
Player
Darwin Blanch
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
69%
(
27 of
39)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
53
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Rafael Nadal
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rafael Nadal
Player
Flavio Cobolli
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jordan Thompson
Player
Rafael Nadal
61%
(
67 of
109)
1st Serve %
73%
(
79 of
108)
8
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
51 of
67)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
58 of
79)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
38 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
37 of
108)
108
Total Points Won
109
|
5-7 7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rafael Nadal
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
76%
(
35 of
46)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Holger Rune Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Luca Nardi
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
59)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Holger Rune
62%
(
52 of
84)
1st Serve %
64%
(
67 of
105)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
42 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
42 of
67)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
22 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
105)
103
Total Points Won
86
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Mariano Navone
66%
(
86 of
131)
1st Serve %
69%
(
73 of
106)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
43 of
73)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
41%
(
54 of
131)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
106)
119
Total Points Won
118
|
5-7 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Holger Rune
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
8
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
95%
(
19 of
20)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
24
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Marc-Andrea Huesler
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve %
68%
(
49 of
72)
3
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
20 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
72)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Holger Rune
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
53%
(
50 of
95)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
87%
(
46 of
53)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
41 of
50)
68%
(
25 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
19 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
32 of
95)
103
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 6-7(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Grigor Dimitrov
70%
(
94 of
135)
1st Serve %
63%
(
74 of
117)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
54 of
74)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
53 of
135)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
43 of
117)
125
Total Points Won
127
|
7-6(9) 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Sumit Nagal
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
88)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Holger Rune
82%
(
41 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
33%
(
3 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Nadal Vs Rune Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
